Why Violence

Why Non violence ? Is there any connection with revolution?
If there is thousands of negations for violence, than i have thousand reasons to support violence. Here i'm clarifing that i no way support the Red Revolution or other Armed revolutions continued by terrorists. But, i'm not completely condemend those also. I'm just justifing the mode and philosophy behind Bhagat Singh, Chandra Sekhar Azad, Subash Chandra Bose, and many more revolutionaries including Shivaji, Maharana Pratap, Tipusulatan, Further i need to include, Dante, Karlmarax, Angle.
I'm here openning the pandora's box ...
All who propagates Nonviolence and naming it indispensible Part of Humanity.
Than my word to this is simple......No...
Why......????
Because , all the gods of nonviolence are hipocrates
From Budha to Jisus chirst, From Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi to Martin Luther king. All who sacrificed thousands of innocent life for the name of nonviolence. For them If sacrifice is necessary for Nonviolence than Violence is better path.(If we not getting any alternative).
First i'm saying about Budha..a foremost preacher of nonviolence
Entire life of Budha was spent to propagate nonviolence. peace,
But he many times to failed to create consensus among his felowers, which brust out immediately after His Mahaprayan.
At the time of his Mahaprayan, Budha told his trusted disciples, that I'm not the last Budha, Even what i said and preached that is not absolute truth.
When we look into the ideal of Jataka's stories, we can understand that violence is a part of life and any living organism can not get rid of this.
Than, Jesus Chirst...He died for the peace and nonviolence. At the time of torture to death, Chirst asking pardon, what the deeds done by the emperror, priests and the loyal armymen. He was crusified along with other notorious criminals. They have one similarity that they had no regret for what they had done. Immediately after the death of Chirst many his fellow man and disciples hanged and killed by royal army. Here a question arises if he excused all the misdoers than why he resurrected? Does he want to show the divine power over evils. Is it not a violence.
Mahatama Gandhi, the great preacher of nonviolence in modern times
All his three great non violence expeditions against Britsher Raj (not Britishers, what he termed) were ended in failure. We got our independence not because of the movements of Mahatma Gandhi, but Due to the threat of revolutionaries, and political agenda with in their own country. There were many incidents where Mahatma Gandhi tried to supress other ideas, by emotional blackmailing. The Gandhi Irwin pact and hanging of Bhagat Singh, Sukhdev, Rajguru. Siding Subash bose from Congress. Etc gives ample example that he want to exert force.
Like Martin Luther king, A movement against anti Black.
Here i want to say one thing Both in violence and non violence, only one thing works i.e, force, one is physical force and later is emotional force, If we termed emotional force as spritual and intellectual than alas i'm undone.
I supports violence over non violence
because,
Fear is a vial for administration, When ever fear diminish arogantness and licentiousness prevails.
We respect god(most of all), not because of love , but Out of fear. He is ominipotent, ominiscient.
If He live normal life like others, see the texts of Ramayan and Mahabharat, how god treated.
This is not only human nature but also the nature of all living organisms.
We got independent for non violent way and see the result what the Indians are today
complete anarchy, corruption, no fear for law and order, no respect for mother country, nothing ....shame to believers of non violence,
Who knows nothing about it yet practising it..propagating it...
They throw away rotten food, they wrap nose in disgusting when ever they passes a dead animal. they scold and cursed when they feel bad.
Non violence became spritual....If we belive that ....Our body only dies, not our soul...
The basic essence and foundation of nonviolence ....